Tailgating
Copyright © 2002, Bernd Felsche, Western Australia
This page presents an automated method of detecting tailgating for
the purpose of education or enforcement.
The method is suited to locations where there are overhead
structures, such as in tunnels or under bridges.
Problem
Research indicates that tailgating is one of the main causes of
speed-related crashes on congested roads; moreso than exceeding
posted speed limits.
Tailgating is supposedly difficult to police, with video cameras
required to obtain evidence of observations by enforcement
officials.
The recommended minimum space between vehicles is generally accepted
to be defined by a 2-second gap; i.e. the following vehicle passes
the same fixed point on the road as a leading vehicle in no less
than 2 seconds.
Enforcement typically takes place when the gap is significantly
less than 1 second; i.e. less than half the safe distance.
The observer has to take into account if vehicles are already
braking when the measurement is taking place.
Equipment
Infra-red light beams (LASER) emitted from locations A and
B above are reflected by surface reflectors aa and
bb respectively. Reflected light is detected at A and
B.
Control unit C processes the interruptions of the beams and
signals the display unit D to display a warning message if
following distances are insufficient, and/or records an image of
the offending vehicle.
Operating Principle
As a leading vehicle clears the beam between B and bb,
a timer (T1) starts within the control unit until the beam
between A and aa is broken.
A second timer (T2) start and waits for the vehicle to pass through
the beam between B and bb.
If the sum of T1 and T2 is insufficient, then the vehicle currently
interrupting both beams appears to be following too closely.
However; the vehicle may be braking already to increase its gap.
To determine if this is the case, the control unit has to wait until
the beam at A is again establised and measure the time
interval (T3) until the beam at B is established.
If T3 is significantly greater than T2, then the vehicle was
slowing during measurement.
The control unit can then decide if it should cause a warning
display to appear to the driver of that vehicle, or cause
photgraphic evidence to be taken of the event.
Because there are two beams that are interrupted by a vehicle, the
controller is able to estimate the maximum reasonable time for each
of its timers to run; else it can assume that a vehicle, or possibly
two vehicles have come to rest above the reflectors.
The system can be used to detect vehicles reversing and to alert
other drivers as well as enforcement officials.
Limitations
-
Vehicles must remain in lanes for measurement.
This can be assured by continuous lane lines, as well as a detector
at the measurement site to identify vehicles crossing the lines.
-
Vehicles must break both beams for a valid measurement.
Narrow-tracked vehicles may be able to avoid reflectors in the lane
if the width of the lane is not entirely covered.
-
Long vehicles may be past the display/camera location for an
effective display or recording of the event.
The effective display/camera angle is shown shaded in the diagram
above.
This can be compensated for by a second display/camera unit further
down-stream that's selectively activated when long vehicles have
been detected.
-
False returns of detection beams can be identified by using pulses
to instead of steady beams for detection.
Premature reflection of a series of pulses indicates that the
vehicle is reflecting/emitting light.
-
An additional camera may be employed for enforcement purposes,
angled so that the followed vehicle is also shown in photos.
-
Reflectors are the most vulnerable components of the system.
Vandalism that may occur if the system is deployed for enforcement.
This can be discouraged if the system records events such as reflector
outage photographically and alerts authorities.
Email me for more details
Copyright © 2002, Bernd Felsche, Western Australia